// have removed this stuff




Would I-1100 and I-1105 Increase Underage Drinking?

Liquor privatization opponent group Protect Our Communities claims that both I-1100 and I-1105 would lead to an increase in underage drinking because¬† “deregulation creates an incentive to sell more alcohol which means more access for teens and more high-risk and underage drinking.”

Seattle’s weekly newspaper¬†The Stranger disagrees, offering a comparison with California as rebuttal:

[L]et’s compare Washington to another state that has privatized liquor. California has an underage-drinking rate of 26.3 percent of teenagers, far below Washington’s 31.3 percent rate, according to the federal government’s Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

However, neither The Stranger’s comparison to current practices nor the Protect Our Communities supposition can answer this question. This is a “what if” question that cannot be answered. Beer and wine are widely accessible in Washington, and it possible to get “as drunk” on beer and wine as hard alcohol.

Learn more about Initiative 1100 and Initiative 1105.

1 comment

  1. Betsy Hauenstein says:

    Hypotheticals do indeed make pretty faulty claims. Take for example the Central Washington University students, they didn’t need easy access to hard liquor to land in the hospital with Blood-Alcohol levels of 0.12 percent to 0.35 percent.

    Reducing underage drinking and over-drinking has little to do with access to alcohol.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>